The National Advocates
Contact Us    888-491-3885 
 Facebook Google+ Twitter LinkedIn
  • Home
  • Membership
    • Top 100 Membership Directory
    • Top 40 Membership Directory
    • Practice Areas by Specialty
    • Top 100 Officers/EC
    • Top 40 Officers/EC
    • Eligibility
    • Benefits
    • Member Portal
  • Legal Education
  • Networking
  • News
  • Shop
  • About Us
    • Meet Our Team
    • Mission & Goal
    • FAQ
    • Contact Us

Immigrant Rights Groups Demand Timely Bond Hearings and Legal Protections for Asylum Seekers

Posted on September 21, 2018 by Andrew Findley
migrant familiesPlaintiffs in an ongoing lawsuit challenging the federal government’s targeted efforts to deter and obstruct asylum seekers seeking protection in the United States have filed a motion for preliminary injunction demanding timely bond hearings that comport with due process. The motion was filed in Padilla v. ICE in federal district court in Seattle, Washington by plaintiffs on behalf of a proposed nationwide class of asylum seekers who are detained after entering the United States. Northwest Immigrant Rights Project and the American Immigration Council represent the plaintiffs and proposed class members. Plaintiffs are asking the court to order the government to provide qualifying individuals with bona fide asylum claims a bond hearing before an immigration judge within seven days of their request. Currently, there is no specified timeline and some asylum seekers languish for weeks or months before appearing in front of an immigration judge. In addition, plaintiffs seek an order requiring basic due process protections in the bond hearing, including that immigration judges record the hearings and make individualized findings if they deny release. Despite the fact that immigration courts record all other types of immigration hearings, they do not record bond hearings. Moreover, when an immigration judge denies release, she or he simply marks an “X” on a form and does not state the basis for the decision, leaving asylum seekers with no way to assess the basis for appeal. And, unlike other custody hearings involving civil detention, the immigration court does not require the government to justify continued detention, but instead places the burden on the detained asylum seeker to demonstrate that she or he should be released. “The Supreme Court has made clear that civil detention cannot be used as a punitive measure,” said Matt Adams, legal director for the Northwest Immigrant Rights Project. “Yet, the manner in which the federal government conducts these bond hearings demonstrates that they are being weaponized, imposing prolonged detention and suffering on asylum seekers in a concerted effort to block their asylum applications.” “Locking people up for weeks or months after they have proven that they have bona fide asylum claim and then denying them a fair and transparent release process is contrary to fundamental pillars of the American judicial system,” said Trina Realmuto, directing attorney at the American Immigration Council.  “We are asking the court to end these injustices and guarantee a fair process.” The motion for preliminary injunctive relief can be read here, as well as the amended complaint, the motion for class certification, and the government’s motion to dismiss.
Posted in Blog | Tagged bond hearings, immigrants, immigration judges, migrants

Comments are closed.

News Categories

Follow Us!

Follow Us on FacebookFollow Us on Google+Follow Us on TwitterFollow Us on LinkedIn

More Legal News

A Kentucky Woman Files Lawsuit Against Hospital Workers for Covering Up a Medical Error

A Kentucky Woman Files Lawsuit Against Hospital Workers for Covering Up a Medical Error

March 5th, 2021

Kim Johnson was nervous as she sat down at her dining room table in January 2015, clutching an unope[...]
Discrimination Lawsuit Against Amazon Claims the Company "De-Levels" Employees of Color

Discrimination Lawsuit Against Amazon Claims the Company "De-Levels" Employees of Color

March 3rd, 2021

A Black woman who has worked at Amazon since 2017 is suing the online retailer and cloud services gi[...]
A Major Texas Power Cooperation Files for Bankruptcy Citing a $1.8B Bill

A Major Texas Power Cooperation Files for Bankruptcy Citing a $1.8B Bill

March 1st, 2021

The largest power cooperative in Texas filed for bankruptcy protection Monday, citing a massive bill[...]
Families Sue a Georgia Chicken Processing Plant After a Nitrogen Leak Left 6 People Dead

Families Sue a Georgia Chicken Processing Plant After a Nitrogen Leak Left 6 People Dead

February 26th, 2021

Victor Vellez had celebrated his 15th wedding anniversary with his wife, Verónica, in mid-Jan[...]
The Mother of Ahmaud Arbery Files a Multi-Million Dollar Civil Lawsuit on the Anniversary of His Death

The Mother of Ahmaud Arbery Files a Multi-Million Dollar Civil Lawsuit on the Anniversary of His Death

February 24th, 2021

The mother of Ahmaud Arbery, the 25-year-old Black man who was chased and gunned down by a group of [...]
 
Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy